Researchers investigating memory storage in mice have found that learned associations can persist after the removal of synaptic connections previously considered necessary for recall. The study, reported in New Scientist, challenges the long-standing view that memory is maintained primarily through the strengthening of specific synapses between neurons.

In the experiments, mice were trained to form a memory, and then the synaptic connections believed to encode that memory were experimentally eliminated. Despite the loss of these connections, the mice continued to demonstrate recall of the learned association.

The finding indicates that the mammalian brain may employ additional or alternative mechanisms for storing memory that do not rely solely on the persistence of specific synaptic pathways. The exact nature of these mechanisms remains under investigation.

Neuroscientists have long theorized that long-term potentiation — the strengthening of synapses based on recent patterns of activity — is the physical substrate of memory. This result suggests that while synaptic changes may be involved in memory formation, they may not be the sole or permanent storage medium.

The research expands the understanding of how memory could be distributed or maintained in neural tissue, raising questions about the roles of intrinsic neuronal properties, glial cells, or network-level dynamics in preserving information.

Further work is needed to identify the alternative storage mechanisms and to determine whether similar principles apply across different types of memory and brain regions. The study was conducted in mice, and its applicability to other mammals, including humans, has not yet been established.

The discovery opens new avenues for research into memory resilience and could eventually inform approaches to memory-related disorders, though any clinical implications remain speculative at this stage.

Sources and further reading

‘Remarkable’ discovery upends our understanding of how brains store memories

This is an independent summary. The complete reporting, supporting context and any primary documents remain with New Scientist.